LWV Utica Rome is currently engaged in a number of projects and studies. These include the following issues.
Impact on Issues is now updated at the end of every legislative session, however, the summary of our positions are only updated after a biennial convention.
Please use the action center to contact your elected officials, or to send a letter to the editor of your local newspaper. Support League issues with just a few clicks of your mouse or take a moment to craft a letter of your own. Sign up for action alerts on the issues that are important to you. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD WITH A CLICK OF A BUTTON!
"In lieu of amendment of the Charter School Act to increase the total number of charters that could be granted, it supports retention of the current total (100) with amendment of the Charter School Act so that a charter could be reissued if a charter school ceased to function for any reason."
The charter school cap is the statutory limit on the number of charter schools that can open in New York State. The 100 charter school cap has been exceeded over the years and is no longer a relevant number. The charter cap is divided by the New York City area and the non-New York City area. Currently the state cap is set at 460 with a smaller sub-cap for New York City. In New York City, 45 total charters are available to be issued in the future, and in regions outside of New York City, 102 total charters are available to be issued.
Position Update Form To be filled out by the Board
The LWVUS study is not about any particular amendment; rather it is about establishing guidelines for evaluating amendments. The study asks us to first decide what constitutes an appropriate and well-crafted amendment. The second part of the study considers the possibility of convening a Constitutional Convention to consider the passage of a proposed amendment.
This process has never been successfully used and so it is rife with questions such as how it would work, who would be the delegates, how they would be chosen and what the convention could consider once convened.
The court's decision affirms the constitutionality of an Arizona state ballot measure approved by voters in 2000, which allowed an independent commissioner to determine congressional districts in the state.
State legislatures determine congressional district boundaries after each census, as dictated by the constitution, but the Arizona measure sought to undo this model, which is widely understood as a tool for partisan lawmakers to divvy up districts to favor the political party in power + also known as gerrymandering.
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the elections clause of the US constitution does not disallow such commissions from being created.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the majority opinion that the clause "doubly empowers the people" for redistricting purposes.
The Supreme Court's oral arguments for the case focused on what precisely a "legislature" is and its decision could have changed the look of the state house. California has a similar commission; this ruling effectively affirms its validity too.
The Supreme Court's ruling could help limit the practice of gerrymandering.
An electronic voters guide with information provided by candidates
Absentee ballot information
Ballot proposition information (where applicable)
Military and Overseas Voting
Polling place locations
Voter registration forms
Currently, candidate information is available for candidates in the races in the primary for NYS Assembly and Senate seats.
Local candidate information can only be gathered by our local league and WE NEED YOUR HELP! Contact Voter_Services@lwvuticarome.org
The purpose of this site is to share League study documents among some 800 national, state and local Leagues and with the public.